You are perfectly right because I had a typo in my example.
It should read ->which(...) instead of ->where(...).
In that case, the condition cannot be violated.
Greetings,
-jo
$gryYup$d0ylprbpriprrYpkJl2xyl~rzg??P~5lp2hyl0p$
| [reply]
[d/l]
[select] |
OK... It was un-runnable pseudo-code anyway; and which as function expects single argument; and, as a method, should be called on a mask without other arguments, right?
Even then, I'm confused, wouldn't you get exactly same result (i.e. $intersect) by simply and-ing ("&") the 2 masks and calling which on it? If example was just simplified for laymen to this tautology, I certainly expect no explanation, sorry to bother.
| [reply]
[d/l]
[select] |
...wouldn't you get exactly same result (i.e. $intersect) by simply and-ing ("&") the 2 masks and calling which on it?
Yes. Thank you!
Greetings,
-jo
$gryYup$d0ylprbpriprrYpkJl2xyl~rzg??P~5lp2hyl0p$
| [reply] |