in reply to Re^3: Readonly vs ReadonlyX (bad style)
in thread Readonly vs ReadonlyX
In hindsight, this is because Readonly is recommending fully qualified subs,
Readonly::Scalar $sca => $initial_value; Readonly::Array @arr => @values; Readonly::Hash %has => (key => value, key => value, ...);
Any "drop-in replacement" supporting this must meddle with the namespace ... ugly!
Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the 𐍀𐌴𐍂𐌻 Programming Language :)
Wikisyntax for the Monastery
|
|---|