in reply to Re^3: Readonly vs ReadonlyX (bad style)
in thread Readonly vs ReadonlyX

> that's unfortunate to word it mildly.

In hindsight, this is because Readonly is recommending fully qualified subs,

Readonly::Scalar $sca => $initial_value; Readonly::Array @arr => @values; Readonly::Hash %has => (key => value, key => value, ...);

Any "drop-in replacement" supporting this must meddle with the namespace ... ugly!

Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the 𐍀𐌴𐍂𐌻 Programming Language :)
Wikisyntax for the Monastery