in reply to Re: Automatic downvote
in thread Automatic downvote

I doubt that's true, what evidence do you have?

I don't have evidence; it's just an observation.

It's against the rules, and the spirit of the place, which isn't to say someone can't do it, but there's no evidence of this.

Yes, but you know, it would not be very difficult to do it.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Automatic downvote
by marto (Cardinal) on Mar 26, 2023 at 08:58 UTC

    I do, but you literally asked if this was possible. It's unlikely that automation is the cause of your down votes.

Re^3: Automatic downvote
by LanX (Saint) on Mar 26, 2023 at 02:17 UTC
    > , but you know, it would not be very difficult to do it

    There had been discussions lately about ppl using automated voting for gaining XP, yes.

    But the gods are monitoring this and punishment would be drastic.

    For the record: they can see who is downvotig who!

    But honestly I think you are overrating yourself if you think someone would set up a bot just to punish you. Sorry!

    It's far more likely that your style has some non-fans.

    Cheers Rolf
    (addicted to the 𐍀𐌴𐍂𐌻 Programming Language :)
    Wikisyntax for the Monastery

      It's not the style, it's the quality of the content. The terrible presentation's just making things even worse.

      The cake is a lie.
      The cake is a lie.
      The cake is a lie.

        His content follows a certain recognizable style. I didn't mean the formatting.

        Cheers Rolf
        (addicted to the 𐍀𐌴𐍂𐌻 Programming Language :)
        Wikisyntax for the Monastery