Re^3: How to perldebug a Term::ReadLine application

He's actually been asked to read "How do I change/delete my post?" on a number of occasions. Using this search, results in four instances of being pointed to that node: [href://?node_id=3989;BIT=17557;pa=harangzsolt33].

In my opinion, this pretence of naïveté, with "I see no delete button", is just trolling. It's another of his snide posts; such as this reply to me: "Re^5: I prefer not to run the latest version of Perl because:". I considered his node for reaping.

— Ken

Comment on Re^3: How to perldebug a Term::ReadLine application

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: How to perldebug a Term::ReadLine application by erzuuli (Cannon) on Mar 29, 2023 at 12:43 UTC
I have unreaped it; it really doesn't meet the minimum threshold for trolling. Note that, with a rep of -7, it will be automatically hidden from anonymonks anyway.	[reply]
Re^5: How to perldebug a Term::ReadLine application by kcott (Archbishop) on Mar 29, 2023 at 15:20 UTC
The purpose of a (reap) consideration is to let monks provide a consensus on whether to reap or not. If it was reaped in error, and you've unreaped it to correct that error, that's fine. — Ken	[reply]