Not quite.

perl -E 'map {say for 1..10} 1..5'
[download]

This was actually intentional as it looks better:

Karl@h3002993:~$ perl -E 'map {say 1..10} 1..5'
12345678910
12345678910
12345678910
12345678910
12345678910
[download]

Or:

karl@h3002993:~$ perl -E 'map {say join " ", 1..10} 1..5'
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
[download]

Compared to:

karl@h3002993:~$ perl -E 'map {say for 1..10} 1..5'
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
[download]

Update: Probably I meant  perl -E 'map {print for 1..10,"\n"} 1..5'

«The Crux of the Biscuit is the Apostrophe»

This was actually intentional as it looks better

But the whole question is about nested loops. By changing the code to look different, you completely missed the point.