Re^5: Testing with Test::Mock::HTTP::Tiny

But why fully qualify the methods that are exported by default?

as a mental note to myself that this sub is from that package

Comment on Re^5: Testing with Test::Mock::HTTP::Tiny Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: Testing with Test::Mock::HTTP::Tiny by Bod (Parson) on Sep 28, 2023 at 11:12 UTC
as a mental note to myself that this sub is from that package That makes sense! I don't think I'll adopt this for obvious method names like `encode_json` but it seems a very sensible approach for methods that are rather ambiguous such as `get` in LWP::Simple	[reply] [d/l] [select]