You've inspired a reverse golf challenge, ignore all simple, portable solutions, what's the most convoluted way to achieve the goal :)

You've inspired a reverse golf challenge, ignore all simple, portable solutions, what's the most convoluted way to achieve the goal :)

Interesting. As a keen student of the lighter side of programming culture, I'm unsure if reverse golf warrants a new distinct category, or if it's just a sub-category of Obfu. Opinions welcome.

Historically, I believe Golf precedes Obfu because John McCarthy grad students played golf ("program bumming") in machine language on an IBM 704 computer in 1959 (APL golf was also popular in the 1960s) ... while the earliest reference to Obfu I'm aware of is 1972, when Messrs Woods and Lyon implemented INTERCAL on an IBM 360. The first International Obfuscated C Code Contest came much later, in 1984 (I see Larry Wall won this contest twice!).

See Also

• The Lighter Side of Perl Culture (Part III): Obfu
• The Lighter Side of Perl Culture (Part IV): Golf
• Rube Goldberg machine

Updated: Noted that Larry Wall won International Obfuscated C contest twice. Added link to Rube Goldberg machine.

👁️🍾👍🦟

fair enough. But the problem of converting html to text can be solved with varied success especially if heuristics are applied, so the more options the better. That's why I keep adding to the list, though the mech-to-pdf was more joking than solving.

Indeed, and my comment wasn't intended as a criticism, rather an opportunity/idea of the inverse golf/Rube Goldberg solution to problems. In so much that code golfing is an exercise, as is a needlessly convoluted one that generates a suitable response.

my $text = `lynx -nolist -dump 'https://www.perlmonks.org/?node_id=11157915'` :)

That's far too Effient. The purpose of such a challenge is to deliberately make it convoluted. Think Rube_Goldberg_machine. In real terms, not everyone has lynx, not everyone can install it on their web host.

Update: added link.