Limit on length of a thread

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Limit on length of a thread by hippo (Archbishop) on Jul 13, 2024 at 09:48 UTC
If there is a limit I doubt any of your threads have hit it. gmake error on Glib compile goes 27 deep and Name Space has almost 300 direct replies. I have a thread which seems to not permit another reponse. Which thread would that be? Why do you think that? 🦛	[reply]
Re^2: Limit on length of a thread by LanX (Saint) on Jul 13, 2024 at 11:25 UTC
I remember one almost 70 deep. When two popes go to war... Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :) see Wikisyntax for the Monastery}	[reply]
Re: Limit on length of a thread by LanX (Saint) on Jul 13, 2024 at 11:06 UTC
No! (Normally...) Which thread? Edit Probably... There are various display limits , which only mean you need a further click to see more. Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :) see Wikisyntax for the Monastery}	[reply]
Re^2: Limit on length of a thread by jmClifford (Beadle) on Jul 13, 2024 at 13:45 UTC
Hi. It was the following post that did not give me an indication/invitation on the rhs, to respond to it. So I assume there is a limit. `https://www.perlmonks.org/?node_id=11160553` [download] Regards JC.....	[reply] [d/l]
Re^3: Limit on length of a thread by Corion (Patriarch) on Jul 13, 2024 at 14:07 UTC
If you follow the URL you posted (Re^5: SQLite returns funny characters), you will find links to reply again. Most likely, you want to set up the "Replies header depth" in your User Settings to something sensible like 20, and the "Replies text depth" as well. Otherwise, a link appear there that "some notes below your chosen reply depth have not been shown".	[reply]
Re^3: Limit on length of a thread by Danny (Chaplain) on Jul 13, 2024 at 14:09 UTC
If it's the first post in a thread/subthread view it doesn't have the "reply" link to the right. Instead, there is a "Comment On" link underneath it.	[reply]

Edit