in reply to Re^3: no way it's not a bug of Perl
in thread I thought I found a bug of Perl
Please note that in mathematics an empty set is always a sub set of all other sets.
And so does the empty pattern in Perl always match.
If no match has previously succeeded, this will (silently) act instead as a genuine empty pattern (which will always match).
Hence not a no-op!°
> that a code expression that doesn't do anything useful should get a special case so that it does something useful.
I disagree. The "repeat the last match" feature should be dependent on an explicit modifier like eg s///b ²
I'd welcome a feature to switch off the current default behavior in favor of an explicit modifier.
Reasoning: The ratio of useful vs confusing is too bad.
°) Demo:
~ $ perl -de0 ... DB<1> $_='XXXX' DB<2> s/(?:)/Y/ # genuine empty pattern DB<3> p YXXXX DB<3> s/(?:)/Z/g DB<4> p ZYZXZXZXZXZ DB<4>
²) in an earlier version I suggested s///l but this modifier is already taken. "b" (for before) seems to be free.
Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
see Wikisyntax for the Monastery
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^5: no way it's not a bug of Perl
by choroba (Cardinal) on Jul 14, 2024 at 23:06 UTC | |
|
Re^5: no way it's not a bug of Perl
by NERDVANA (Priest) on Jul 15, 2024 at 08:26 UTC |