in reply to Re^4: Limit of 300 in "older entries"?
in thread Limit of 300 in "older entries"?
But I found a later discussion justifying the 300...tye: Blowing out the memory consumption . . .
Ha! In response to a patch I submitted to remove the restriction (except on the initial search).
Not sure if was vroom, because the first patch is from demerphq and seems to have used a Everything engine page as a base.
The current htmlcode, newlistapproved, was implemented on Everything devel on 2000-02-10, and imported to PerlMonks on 2000-03-15.
It has author credits of both vroom and nate.
Maybe nate did the development and vroom imported it here. That would be a common scenario.
Who knows?
Earlier versions of the code (listapproved, etc.) did not have the limit.
Perhaps interestingly, Everything2 codebase does not have "listapproved";
no htmlcode in the vicinity of 2000-02/03 seems to have anything to do with listing writeups in sections.
Maybe that's not surprising; E2 doesn't have the concept of sections, nor of approval.
E2's htmlcode nodes jump from 298 to 166222, all within the month of 1999-11 (while newlistapproved is node id 4692).
This implies that:
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^6: Limit of 300 in "older entries"?
by etj (Priest) on Aug 15, 2024 at 19:58 UTC | |
by jdporter (Paladin) on Aug 15, 2024 at 21:47 UTC | |
by cavac (Prior) on Aug 16, 2024 at 10:10 UTC |