in reply to Re^3: [XS] : "snprintf" portability options
in thread [XS] : "snprintf" portability options

jdporter or someone - when I saw the reply in my "chatterbox", it didn't link to my article, but to a node "XS" (a Super Search link). I think that might be a bug?
  • Comment on Re^4: [XS] : "snprintf" portability options

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: [XS] : "snprintf" portability options
by hippo (Archbishop) on Sep 17, 2024 at 12:48 UTC
Re^5: [XS] : "snprintf" portability options
by jdporter (Paladin) on Sep 17, 2024 at 15:34 UTC
    jdporter or someone . . .

    I can see now that we need a "mentions" notification feature. :-/

      Yes and no.

      Mentions notifications would be nice!

      But bug reports should be collected in Perl Monks Discussion

      For instance I knew you patched the length after our discussion.

      But I wasn't easily able to find neither discussion nor patch.

      Ikegami did the right thing.

      Cheers Rolf
      (addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
      see Wikisyntax for the Monastery

        Yes and no.

        Or just no. This isn't facebook.


        🦛

Re^5: [XS] : "snprintf" portability options (bugfix)
by LanX (Saint) on Sep 17, 2024 at 11:23 UTC
      The reply I saw had a SQBRid:// link, but the inner SQBRXS "won", so I hope it's solved properly with that second go.
      Test bug anonymously by lanx
      Test after patch committed by lanx