in reply to Re^4: [XS] : "snprintf" portability options
in thread [XS] : "snprintf" portability options
Bad test. You just repeated what was already said. But replacing 0 with 9223372036854775808ull does make your point.
So the compiler is wrong about the expected format. wow!
And thankfully, it still provides the expected format.
If it is a bug, it's a bug in perl
It's a bug in gcc. The format expects a unsigned long long, but it claims it expects an unsigned.
|
|---|