Re^7: Ideas for PerlMonks 2.0

when I search the site, there should be a switch that allows me to search for part of a word...

There is no doubt that our search could be more capable. But how about, instead of getting into the details here, we simply say that the new site should have powerful, modern search capabilities. We'll probably use some existing, off-the-shelf technology (Lucene, maybe?) for searching. And we are not going to re-invent Google. You know you can already use Google to search PerlMonks, right?

The site should have the ability to upload a file like a zip file containing a bigger program than just a code snippet.
Have the ability to upload a zip file into each person's profile....

Absolutely not.

That being said, we could probably have better "integration" with external filedump sites such as github and pastebin.

the website should allow people to post pictures if they want to

Unlike some others here, I am not fundamentally opposed to this. We'd want to be sure to limit the capability, e.g. max size, max dimensions, max number of images uploaded, etc.
And users (readers) should be able to choose how "embedded" images get rendered — either in-line or as links they can click on (rather like how we treat spoilers).

Today's latest and greatest software contains tomorrow's zero day exploits.

Comment on Re^7: Ideas for PerlMonks 2.0

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^8: Ideas for PerlMonks 2.0 by hv (Prior) on Dec 09, 2024 at 17:03 UTC
There is no doubt that our search could be more capable. But how about, instead of getting into the details here, we simply say that the new site should have powerful, modern search capabilities. We'll probably use some existing, off-the-shelf technology (Lucene, maybe?) for searching. And we are not going to re-invent Google. You know you can already use Google to search PerlMonks, right? Google, and (TTBOMK) standard settings for existing off-the-shelf technology, are geared to search for words, and totally fail when you want to search for a string in which non-word characters are significant. Being able to search for posts that contain, eg, `(?=...)` should be a quality test for any PerlMonks search feature.	[reply] [d/l]
Re^9: Ideas for PerlMonks 2.0 by jdporter (Paladin) on Dec 09, 2024 at 17:41 UTC
Good point, and I would never suggest that we would defer all of our search capability to google. Search engines like Lucene have lots of knobs to twiddle, including "what's a word?" and "search only whole words". We would also continue to support direct access to the database's native search, so e.g. `text like '%(?=...)%'` would be no problem. Today's latest and greatest software contains tomorrow's zero day exploits.	[reply] [d/l]
Re^8: Ideas for PerlMonks 2.0 by cavac (Prior) on Dec 10, 2024 at 15:08 UTC
If we allow pictures, we certainly should enforce limits (pixel size, file size, number, images per months, minimum XP required, etc). Images in posts could certainly be helpful, both to illustrate a problem and to show solutions. On Telegram, when communicating with my fellow humans, it's often much easier to post a screenshot with a big circle around a checkbox or button (with a helpful note "Click here"), than it is to describe in textual form on what to click. Of course, to distinguish us from the rest of the internet, we need to find a way to block cat pictures... :-) PerlMonks XP is useless? Not anymore: XPD - Do more with your PerlMonks XP Also check out my sisters artwork and my weekly webcomics	[reply]
Re^9: Ideas for PerlMonks 2.0 by afoken (Chancellor) on Dec 10, 2024 at 20:27 UTC
we need to find a way to block cat pictures... :-) Too late! Alexander -- Today I will gladly share my knowledge and experience, for there are no sweeter words than "I told you so". ;-)	[reply]