Re^8: Ideas for PerlMonks 2.0

I have to think about that. That would essentially mean we'd have to run the two systems in parallel for the forseeable future? Or am i misunderstanding something here?

Edit: If we forgo most specialized markups and go with proper HTML, the ckeditor4 fork i'm currently using in my projects should be able to handle editing most existing (rendered) markups of the monastery. Plus, it's plain HTML, which i find way easier to use than all that Wiki markup stuff.

PerlMonks XP is useless? Not anymore: XPD - Do more with your PerlMonks XP
Also check out my sisters artwork and my weekly webcomics

Comment on Re^8: Ideas for PerlMonks 2.0

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^9: Ideas for PerlMonks 2.0 by jdporter (Paladin) on Dec 10, 2024 at 18:20 UTC
we'd have to run the two systems in parallel for the forseeable future Yep. We wouldn't want to put this system in to 'archive' status (accept no new content) until the new system has been fully checked out and passed user acceptance testing, at the absolute earliest. Then we can push everybody over there. It may be that there are some users who simply refuse to use the replacement system. Not sure what to do about them. Leave the current system running forever?	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^9: Ideas for PerlMonks 2.0
by jdporter (Paladin) on Dec 10, 2024 at 18:20 UTC

we'd have to run the two systems in parallel for the forseeable future

Yep. We wouldn't want to put this system in to 'archive' status (accept no new content) until the new system has been fully checked out and passed user acceptance testing, at the absolute earliest. Then we can push everybody over there. It may be that there are some users who simply refuse to use the replacement system. Not sure what to do about them. Leave the current system running forever?

[reply]