in reply to Re^5: Ideas for "fixing" PerlMonks 1.0
in thread Ideas for "fixing" PerlMonks 1.0

Links, please. Either to patches, or to discussion wherein the gods were shown things which were subsequently ignored. The architecture of the Free Nodelet is specifically to support functionality not needing patch support.

I will reiterate again:

  1. Standing up a dev system would be extremely difficult. Almost any other approach we could take would be easier.
  2. It is entirely safe to submit a patch. And reverting a patch after it has been applied is also quick and reliable.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^7: Ideas for "fixing" PerlMonks 1.0
by LanX (Saint) on Dec 16, 2024 at 22:43 UTC
    > Links, please
    • Toby's design was already linked
    • the wikisyntax was already linked
    • I deliberately didn't link to the js patch for everything, but since you insist it's here

    > Standing up a dev system would be extremely difficult.

    That's why I suggested to use an old everything for pmdevs as playground

    You wanted elaboration, I elaborated.

    Cheers Rolf
    (addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
    see Wikisyntax for the Monastery

[reply]

In Section Perl Monks Discussion