in reply to Re^10: Ideas for "fixing" PerlMonks 1.0
in thread Ideas for "fixing" PerlMonks 1.0
I need to apply patches to the node in question to code efficiently, yes.
You write 'em, we'll apply 'em. Yes it goes slower, but it will still be faster than the current pace of development!
Ok if there are no plans to hash the passwords, why bother?
What do you mean by "plans"? Obviously we'd all like to see improvements made. Simply goading the gods isn't how it happens. If you can provide coding & subject matter expertise, we can work together.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^12: Ideas for "fixing" PerlMonks 1.0
by LanX (Saint) on Dec 18, 2024 at 22:14 UTC | |
by jdporter (Paladin) on Dec 20, 2024 at 22:07 UTC | |
by LanX (Saint) on Dec 21, 2024 at 01:36 UTC | |
by jdporter (Paladin) on Dec 21, 2024 at 04:21 UTC | |
by LanX (Saint) on Dec 21, 2024 at 13:38 UTC | |
| |
by LanX (Saint) on Dec 21, 2024 at 11:20 UTC |