in reply to Re^2: Existing module for PerlX::Maybe except for hash existence?
in thread Existing module for PerlX::Maybe except for hash existence?

Your example fails.

There are three states: Alive, dead, superposition.

There's no need to differentiate between not provided and undef. Both would be considered superposition.

And you mention command-line arguments where it's not even possible to pass undef, completely defying your point.

Your example supports haj, not you.

  • Comment on Re^3: Existing module for PerlX::Maybe except for hash existence?