in reply to Re: Anonymous Google Chrome browsers now under additional scrutiny
in thread Anonymous Google Chrome browsers now under additional scrutiny
But probably it's better to redirect blacklisted IPs to some static and link-wise shallow fake content to feed them a little. ¹
Otherwise HTTP-Errors are easily detected, so someone might be triggered to improve the attack.
From my understanding they are using IP-farms to attack us and share the harvested links among them for the next requests. Like that we might trap far more IPs in our "honeyfarm"
Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
see Wikisyntax for the Monastery
¹) like a wget-mirror of the last week in a dedicated node-id range, there is a huge unused gap there, which we could reuse.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^3: Anonymous Google Chrome browsers now under additional scrutiny
by cavac (Prior) on May 09, 2025 at 14:35 UTC |