Re^4: Strange Occurrence in Substitution Statement

I think it's simpler, the pattern isn't empty, because (?:...) is always part of the pattern. Meta characters count too.

This idiom is meant to be used as s//something/ in complicated parsing, kind of inherited from sed/awk IIRC.

You should also be aware that a genuinely empty pattern IS always matching. In your case the replacement is just invisible because empty.

So I'd rather prefer to make this explicit and self documenting

s/$extra// if $extra

Nowadays I doubt there are more than a fraction of a percent of programmers knowing/using this feature.

I'd really like to see a Perl version/feature to switch it off by default.

Cheers Rolf
_{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)

see Wikisyntax for the Monastery}

Comment on Re^4: Strange Occurrence in Substitution Statement Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Strange Occurrence in Substitution Statement by choroba (Cardinal) on May 07, 2025 at 06:38 UTC
> I'd really like to see a Perl version/feature to switch it off by default. I'd love that. And introducing something like `/(PREVIOUS)/` for those who need it. `map{substr$_->[0],$_->[1]\|\|0,1}[\\|\|{},3],[[]],[ref qr-1,-,-1],[{}],[sub{}^*ARGV,3]`	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^6: Strange Occurrence in Substitution Statement by LanX (Saint) on May 07, 2025 at 19:42 UTC
> And introducing something like (PREVIOUS) for those who need it.* Exists already since 5.37.10 as `${^LAST_SUCCESSFUL_PATTERN}` Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :) see Wikisyntax for the Monastery}	[reply]
Re^5: Strange Occurrence in Substitution Statement by roho (Bishop) on May 07, 2025 at 04:36 UTC
Thanks LanX. I agree that this feature should be off by default. I think it falls into the category of being a little TOO helpful, with the side effects being very difficult to pin down. I spent days trying to isolate the cause and came up empty until posing the question here. Thanks to everyone for your help. "It's not how hard you work, it's how much you get done."	[reply]