in reply to AI in the workplace

Without soliciting answers from the masses, what are your responses to these questions? also.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: AI in the workplace
by talexb (Chancellor) on Jun 02, 2025 at 02:08 UTC

    I didn't want to influence the discussion with my thoughts, and I thank the monks for sharing their thoughts.

    My observations are that AI is pretty good at analysis, really not that good at writing code. And by writing code, I mean

    • A good description of how it's going to solve the problem;
    • A well structured piece of code that actually solves the problem; and
    • Comments in the code that explain each ste.
    If you get back a bunch of code that's a mess, a mish-mish of things that were found on the net, without any comments, that's not worth much.

    And I think 'vibe coding' is a joke. I'd like to see a demo of an AI being told to write some code, and actually have it produce something that a) works properly, and b) produces readable, useful code.

    Alex / talexb / Toronto

    For a long time, I had a link in my .sig going to Groklaw. I heard that as of December 2024, this link is dead. Still, thanks to PJ for all your work, we owe you so much. RIP Groklaw -- 2003 to 2013.