Re^6: AI in the workplace

> That's not the second worst node of the year. That's just what you say.

"Worst Nodes of The Year" has a well defined meaning in the monastery.

Worst Nodes of The Year
#    Node    Author    Rep
1    new perl distribution    pault    -21
2    Incorporating ChatGPT into PerlMonks    harangzsolt33    -17     
+ <----
3    Re^4: set proto string    vincentaxhe    -14
[download]

Insisting on semantics by introducing personal metrics for good and bad won't help you here.

Now I even played along and tried a POC (or rather a nonPOC) of your "idea" here°.

You are more than welcome to demonstrate a positive outcome by creating automated prompts for OPs stemming from real world discussions in the monastery.

IOW "ideas" are not enough as long as you can't demonstrate how this is supposed to work out.

As long as you just repeatedly throw your creativity + LOLs at us, many people won't take you seriously, and reward you with down-votes.

Cheers Rolf
_{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)

see Wikisyntax for the Monastery}

°) Re^7: AI in the workplace (... in the Monastery)

Comment on Re^6: AI in the workplace Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^7: AI in the workplace by marto (Cardinal) on Jul 28, 2025 at 16:43 UTC
""Worst Nodes of The Year" has a well defined meaning in the monastery." They are aware. See also the posts complaining about downvoting of "good ideas" & "automated downvotes" etc. Consider this then the assertion that it's still a "good idea" to provide such slop in an automated response when someone posts in SoPW, for someone else to come clean up while likely wasting the users time.	[reply]