in reply to Re: Faster (but uglier) PWC 350-2 solutions
in thread Faster (but uglier) PWC 350-2 solutions
My go solution is much much faster.
How much (if I may)? I've never run Go nor have it; at ATO (can link if requested), your Go function runs in ~600 mks and ~900 ms for Examples 2 and 4 arguments respectively. I know it's a silly test. Perl results from my previous answer, for the same args, are better when run locally at rather old PC
|
|---|