in reply to ORM for new native Perl Object System

Perl New Native Object System -> PenNOS

or

Perl Native Object System -> PeNOS But be careful! The "I" and "O" are next to each other on my keyboard, so an unfortunate typo is quickly made.

CountZero

A program should be light and agile, its subroutines connected like a string of pearls. The spirit and intent of the program should be retained throughout. There should be neither too little or too much, neither needless loops nor useless variables, neither lack of structure nor overwhelming rigidity." - The Tao of Programming, 4.1 - Geoffrey James

My blog: Imperial Deltronics
  • Comment on Re: ORM for new native Perl Object System

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: ORM for new native Perl Object System
by cavac (Prior) on Dec 16, 2025 at 09:21 UTC

    That's the problem with us software developers. We are just not good at finding marketable names. You know, names that aren't acronymes.

    What about these:

    • Objects++
    • SuperObjects
    • Blessed camels

    I know, i know. I'm also very bad at naming things...

    PerlMonks XP is useless? Not anymore: XPD - Do more with your PerlMonks XP
    Also check out my sisters artwork and my weekly webcomics
      We are just not good at finding marketable names.

      Think of pixel, switch, lens, atom, electron, chrome and chromium, pebble, brackets, tab, scirocco, bora, galaxy. All are generic words abused as brand names, or major parts of brand names, creating unnecessary ambiguities and polluting search results.

      Alexander

      --
      Today I will gladly share my knowledge and experience, for there are no sweeter words than "I told you so". ;-)