Re^6: PM Leveling Guide.

I'm not sure the regulars see his posts objectively anymore.

For the sake of argument lets say they do not -- does it make a difference? I guess that it does not

IIRC I've seen maybe 5 semi-on-point responses that appear to have helped the OP in some way ... out of the last 500

Thats a horrible ration, and I don't even vote

Comment on Re^6: PM Leveling Guide.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^7: PM Leveling Guide. by chacham (Prior) on Mar 06, 2015 at 04:12 UTC
You're so cute when you post "anonymously." :)	[reply]
Re^8: PM Leveling Guide. by Your Mother (Archbishop) on Mar 06, 2015 at 05:37 UTC
I’m curious who you think that monk is really? Me? I’m much too vain and vested in my belief that I’m the funniest monk there is to forgo `<abbr title="If Iranians relished Coke"/>` on the IIRC. And I’m too obsessive about proper typography: ... is typed … I also said I wouldn’t pull anymore punches on this topic: Re^2: Porting (old) code to something else. So, who is it? BUk doesn’t post anonymously and isn’t shy at all in any case… most of the regulars anons always do since the great plain text password massacre.	[reply] [d/l]
Re^9: PM Leveling Guide. (quotes) by tye (Sage) on Mar 06, 2015 at 18:25 UTC
And I’m too obsessive about proper typography: ... is typed … "... is typed …" is typed "`'...'` is typed `'…'`"`</pedantry>`. ;) - tye	[reply] [d/l]
Re^10: PM Leveling Guide. (quotes) by Your Mother (Archbishop) on Mar 06, 2015 at 21:11 UTC
Re^8: PM Leveling Guide. by Anonymous Monk on Mar 06, 2015 at 08:40 UTC
Yes, I am cute, others agree See january Re^3: How to determine if an array contains an undef value?, Re: Which WebApp framework should I use? ... last 150 nodes, there might be a few more adding up to 5 ... not just me-too-nodes, and then you're up to jul2014 where he says you're right to Your Mother... about 400 nodes ... lots of his nodes promote ignore voting feelings, but lots of his nodes promote down vote feelings ... its a rare node that promotes upvote feeling ... I say "feeling" for lack of a better word because I don't vote Its real easy to see some voting regular consider the distraction level of his responses for a particular OP, and erring on the side of caution and downvoting ... not every node is worth the effort to refute, so a quick downvote and off to read the next newest node So yeah, when the regulars like me visit every day ... they're doing pretty well in the objectively category Hello chacham, I remember Perl(Hello World) :)	[reply]