in reply to Re: Can you improve upon my algorithm.
in thread Can you improve upon my algorithm.

It'll take me a while to wrap my head around this, and read through the (much clearer) paper you linked in your other reply, but I can't resist commenting on:

where block exchange looks like my triple reverse from last week:)

I laughed myself to sleep after reading: "There is a more elegant algorithm which is considered to be a part of folklore. blah blah blah. The proof of correctness is left to the reader."

No wonder, given their documentation methods. My proof:

abc12345 54321cba 12345cba 12345abc

Sor''d! :)


With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". I'm with torvalds on this
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice. Agile (and TDD) debunked