in reply to Re^4: map vs for\foreach.
in thread map vs for\foreach.

BTW:

#!/usr/bin/env perl
use strict;
use warnings;
use Data::Dump;

my @original_data_set = ( 1 .. 10 );
dd \@original_data_set;

my @modified_data_set = map { $_++} @original_data_set;
dd \@original_data_set, \@modified_data_set;

__END__
karl-mac-mini:monks karl$ ./1119980.pl
[1 .. 10]
([2 .. 11], [1 .. 10])

[download]

Best regards, karl

«The Crux of the Biscuit is the Apostrophe»

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: map vs for\foreach.
by LanX (Saint) on Mar 13, 2015 at 18:38 UTC
    So the so called "modified" set isn't really modified because its a post increment.

    While being consistent and logic it's indeed surprising, and a good reason to generally prefer pre-increments.

    edit

    Thanks seems like I have to rethink my habit.

    Cheers Rolf
    (addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :)

    PS: Je suis Charlie!

[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom