in reply to Re: [OT] A measure of 'sortedness'?
in thread [OT] A measure of 'sortedness'?
Q: How to sort lots of data. A: Using mergesort.
Ooh! Why didn't I think of that. Erm . Let me re-phrase: What makes you think I haven't already considered that?
That is the traditional way isn't it. (Surprised its taken you 3 days to look that up.) So what's wrong with the traditional way?
To find out, generate yourself a 100GB file of random 64-bit ints (about 15 minutes work with a one-liner) and then use your local system sort utility to sort it. Then come back to me when its finished, and we'll discuss it further.
See you in 3 or 4 days!
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^3: [OT] A measure of 'sortedness'?
by Anonymous Monk on Mar 20, 2015 at 18:14 UTC | |
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Mar 20, 2015 at 19:32 UTC |