Re^2: Perl to executable without releasing source code?

in reply to Re: Perl to executable without releasing source code?
in thread Perl to executable without releasing source code?

> No. Maybe perlcc.

even then, it should be possible to feed an op-tree into B::Deparse

see also Rafl's comment here

Cheers Rolf
_{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :)}

PS: Je suis Charlie!

Comment on Re^2: Perl to executable without releasing source code?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Perl to executable without releasing source code? by Anonymous Monk on Mar 23, 2015 at 22:46 UTC
Maybe you LanX should read the whole comment ... compiled to not bytecode its should be impossible to recover the source as its assembler	[reply]
Re^4: Perl to executable without releasing source code? by LanX (Saint) on Mar 23, 2015 at 22:59 UTC
Maybe you haven't read rafl's comment? The optree is reconstructed from C code, B::Deparse just needs a pointer to the optree to disassemble Perl. Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :)} PS: Je suis Charlie!	[reply]
Re^5: Perl to executable without releasing source code? by Anonymous Monk on Mar 24, 2015 at 00:11 UTC
Maybe you haven't read rafl's comment? Ah, you forgot to link to it. This is how you link to it http://stackoverflow.com/a/4048916 -> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4048614/how-can-i-reverse-engineer-a-perl-program-that-has-been-compiled-with-perlcc/4048916#4048916	[reply]
Re^6: Perl to executable without releasing source code? by LanX (Saint) on Mar 24, 2015 at 00:13 UTC

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom