Re: ActiveState PPM, no Tk present

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: ActiveState PPM, no Tk present by Anonymous Monk on Apr 07, 2015 at 09:05 UTC
I know there's no Tk. But ... there is Tkx instead, which provides a wrapper between Perl and genuine Tcl-Tk. Tk is available from both http://code.activestate.com/ppm/Tk/ and http://www.bribes.org/perl/ppm/Tk.ppd Obviously using Tkx will be easier for new development, as there are some minor differences. But porting an existing program to Tkx might not be too taxing. Obiously you've never used Tkx :) Did you know Tk is available via ppm? so there is absolutely no reason to learn Tkx. Tkx is the worst possible option	[reply]
Re^3: ActiveState PPM, no Tk present by Dumu (Monk) on Apr 07, 2015 at 11:15 UTC
Great, I shall try beautiful Perl/Tk for an upcoming project. Thanks! I still think Tkx was a good idea, but I've an open mind.	[reply]
Re^4: ActiveState PPM, no Tk present by Anonymous Monk on Apr 07, 2015 at 23:00 UTC
I still think Tkx was a good idea, but I've an open mind. On both ends? :) See Tcl::Tk -- gisle worked on this as well, its much better in all respects than Tkx. Tcl::pTk is even more better.	[reply]
Re^5: ActiveState PPM, no Tk present by Dumu (Monk) on Apr 08, 2015 at 08:26 UTC
Re^6: ActiveState PPM, no Tk present by Anonymous Monk on Apr 08, 2015 at 08:32 UTC
Some notes below your chosen depth have not been shown here
Re^6: ActiveState PPM, no Tk present by afoken (Chancellor) on Apr 08, 2015 at 09:29 UTC