This is a common reaction to receiving criticism instead of praise when you publicly post code for others to review. I have a lot of code that works great for me, but no one else. If i did post such code, i would expect a number of criticisms, each one with the single intention of improving the code i posted so that many more people may use it. That code works great for you? Well, now it should work even better. I actually took the time to diff the output of your original code against what i changed and there was zero difference. Hopefully you will review what i posted and compare and contrast it to what you have, learn something new and improve your own skills.
You are welcome. :)
jeffa
L-LL-L--L-LL-L--L-LL-L--
-R--R-RR-R--R-RR-R--R-RR
B--B--B--B--B--B--B--B--
H---H---H---H---H---H---
(the triplet paradiddle with high-hat)
| [reply]
[d/l]
[select] |
erichansen1836:
Considering that the code takes no input and simply prints a fixed data sequence to a file, in what way does it encode anything?
If "works great for me" means "it prints the fixed sequence I want", fine. But the misleading encoding/encrypting documentation should be removed. On the other hand, if the documentation specifies the intended functionality, you probably ought to finish writing the code.
...roboticus
When your only tool is a hammer, all problems look like your thumb.
| [reply] |