in reply to Perl.js: porting Perl to the browser?

Your first para contains a reasonable question for posting in SOPW.

What follows is mere speculation with no demonstration of any real relevance. And I, for one, am not going to play with what's displayed at the unknown site to which you linked without locking it down in a sandbox.

If you're so inclined, why not find out what is claimed and write some code to test what it does. Then you'll have a node that's worth inconveniencing the electrons cooped to create it.


check Ln42!

  • Comment on Re: Perl.js: porting Perl to the browser?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Perl.js: porting Perl to the browser?
by QM (Parson) on Apr 27, 2015 at 10:03 UTC
    Then you'll have a node that's worth inconveniencing the electrons cooped to create it.

    Bonus points for considering the tortured disenfranchised electrons.

    -QM
    --
    Quantum Mechanics: The dreams stuff is made of

[reply]
[d/l]
Re^2: Perl.js: porting Perl to the browser?
by soonix (Chancellor) on Apr 28, 2015 at 05:33 UTC
    … unknown site to which you linked without locking it down in a sandbox.
    from the OP's URL I guess the source code is at https://github.com/gfx/perl.js
[reply]

      Address in the link (which is https://gfx.github.io/perl.js) is easy enough to read (hover on link w/browser which shows content) without opening it; "unknown" refers to "trusted" or "untrusted." Without prior recommendation from a reliable source, the site's "mission in life" (development effort, malware distro, etc) is "unknown."


      Spirit of the Monastery


[reply]
[d/l]

        Address in the link (which is https://gfx.github.io/perl.js) is easy enough to read (hover on link w/browser which shows content) without opening it; "unknown" refers to "trusted" or "untrusted." Without prior recommendation from a reliable source, the site's "mission in life" (development effort, malware distro, etc) is "unknown."

        ww, afraid to visit github?

[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom