Re^2: Naming ordinals (directions/sides/faces) in the presence of 3D rotation?

Okay. So the view you have is:


  +-------+
  | o   o |
  |   o   |
  | o   o |
  +-------+
[download]

What number face is point right as you observe it?

In general, substituting numbers/colours/directions/points of the compass doesn't change the problem.

With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'

Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.

"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". I'm with torvalds on this

In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice. Agile (and TDD) debunked

Comment on Re^2: Naming ordinals (directions/sides/faces) in the presence of 3D rotation? Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Naming ordinals (directions/sides/faces) in the presence of 3D rotation? by RedElk (Hermit) on Apr 27, 2015 at 23:18 UTC
Well, if I knew the initial layout prior to the applied rotation (e.g. left/right = #1/#3, front/back = #2/#4, top/bottom = #5/#6), then seeing #5 I could reason that the right frame is #3. But, mmm, it's not that easy is it?	[reply]