in reply to Re: Useful number of childs revisited
in thread Useful number of childs revisited [SOLVED]

"Using '/tmp' as the temp directory is badly broken"

Thank you very much for the hint.

"...What's wrong with for my n (@numbers)..."

Nothing is wrong with it. But the iterator was significantly faster in the example in my OP.

Update: Please see also this bug

Update 2:

"...iterator was ... faster"

I thought this might be of interest:

karls-mac-mini:monks karl$ ./forker.pl numbers: 2000 processes: 4 fork: 31.1171970367432 for: 40.2419550418854

I used this code...

while(defined( my $number = $iterator->())) { $pm->start($number) and next; my $factorial = Math::BigInt->bfac($number); $pm->finish( 0, \$factorial ); } $pm->wait_all_children;

...vs. this:

for my $number (@numbers) { $pm->start($number) and next; my $factorial = Math::BigInt->bfac($number); $pm->finish( 0, \$factorial ); } $pm->wait_all_children;

Best regards, Karl

«The Crux of the Biscuit is the Apostrophe»