in reply to Re^3: strangeness with prototypes and 'logical defined or'?
in thread strangeness with prototypes and 'logical defined or'?

Well, no comma is necessary between the "indirect object slot" (or whatever it's called) and the next argument. Only 7 needs a preceding comma.

Good point, only one comma is required for this well formed nonsense :) its still nonsense though

  • Comment on Re^4: strangeness with prototypes and 'logical defined or'?