Re^2: RFC: A call to bioinformationalists for some generic information.

Thing is I need people who'll understand my lingo. If I hit a bio forum and get the terms wrong (and I would), I'd get nowhere.

If you're active on an appropriate forum and feel like posting a pointer to the root node, that'd be great.

Update: Plus, I guess that if no one using perl is doing this, there'd be little point in pursuing it.

With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'

Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.

"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". I'm with torvalds on this

In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice. Agile (and TDD) debunked

Comment on Re^2: RFC: A call to bioinformationalists for some generic information.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: RFC: A call to bioinformationalists for some generic information. by jdporter (Paladin) on May 28, 2015 at 14:06 UTC
fwiw, I concur with einhverfr. Perl is used extensively in the bioinformatics community, but (I dare say) most of those folks don't hang out on perlmonks. Your chances of a "hit" are better there than here, I guess. I reckon we are the only monastery ever to have a dungeon stuffed with 16,000 zombies.	[reply]