Re^2: Is CGI.pm dead?

Essentially it is "done".

So no CGI v5? Well, I guess the advocates of backward compatibility will be happier. But in any case thank you for taking care of a module that will probably stay with us for a while longer :-)

BTW, perhaps better terms would be "mature" or even "legacy"...

Comment on Re^2: Is CGI.pm dead?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Is CGI.pm dead? by leej (Monk) on May 29, 2015 at 14:47 UTC
Nope, no v5. I'm just about to drop a release on CPAN that basically says "game over" for all but critical issues.	[reply]
Re^4: Is CGI.pm dead? by Anonymous Monk on May 30, 2015 at 08:12 UTC
s/game over/i'm out/	[reply]
Re^5: Is CGI.pm dead? by leej (Monk) on Jun 01, 2015 at 08:40 UTC
Indeed, yes. Although i'll be here to stop unicorn/pony requests the code is on github so can be forked, and i'll be happy to look at pull requests if they don't break back compat (and add tests, etc).	[reply]