in reply to Re^2: [C Question] Determine if gcc provides erfl() function
in thread [C Question] Determine if gcc provides erfl() function

However, it's just occurred to me that the executable actually doesn't do anything.
Could it be that success is achieved only because the problem I'm trying to expose is being optimised away ?


So, I made the test executable actually do something, and uploaded a new version (0.14) of Math::LongDouble.
Unfortunately, I still get the same failure reports from Bingos' NetBSD smoker(s), and the test executable works fine.

I guess the next thing is to try compiling the test executable using the same cflags ($Config{ccflags}) as are used during the module build.
So, I'll try that.
Should I also include $Config{ldflags} in the build of the test executable ?
Any other ideas ? (Any other flags to include ?)

Cheers,
Rob
  • Comment on Re^3: [C Question] Determine if gcc provides erfl() function

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: [C Question] Determine if gcc provides erfl() function
by Anonymous Monk on Jun 02, 2015 at 09:51 UTC