in reply to Re: Annotations for Perl
in thread Annotations for Perl

Yes, i know that. But there is a big difference between writing one-string and production OOP code. For first- you don't need IDE

My purpose is to make tool for people developing readable structural projects, not for perl magicians :)

And after all, do you have an alternative solution for described problem?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Annotations for Perl
by Anonymous Monk on Jun 02, 2015 at 22:53 UTC

    Yes, i know that. But there is a big difference between writing one-string and production OOP code.

    choroba is talking about "production", he is not talking about "one-string"

    My purpose is to make tool for people developing readable structural projects, not for perl magicians :)

    Why would those people start with a code editor, instead of some UML code generating tool?

    And after all, do you have an alternative solution for described problem?

    Module::Info, Doxygen::Filter::Perl,.... :)

      Module::Info says itself that it's unreliable in this part, Doxygen is fine, but we've got de-facto standart as pod and previously been suggested, there is a =for