Re: [OT] How about an Off Topic Section?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: [OT] How about an Off Topic Section? by Anonymous Monk on Jun 07, 2015 at 08:23 UTC
not an OT section, but a JavaScript section might be a good strategical move. Not without with some kind of recruitment drive ... stackoverflow has lots of "tags" ... that are virtual deserts of interest ... a js section on perlmonks? that will get attention ?	[reply]
Re^3: [OT] How about an Off Topic Section? by LanX (Saint) on Jun 07, 2015 at 10:42 UTC
We were talking about an OT sections for PM. Would that need a recruitment drive? This would grow slowly and a marathon doesn't start with a sprint. Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :) Je suis Charlie!}	[reply]
Re^4: [OT] How about an Off Topic Section? by jdporter (Paladin) on Jun 07, 2015 at 14:35 UTC
You folks are spending a lot of time/energy going 'round and 'round about what exactly this new section would be named, but you don't seem to have grokked the faqlet "I think there should be a new Section..." Please go do that first. I reckon we are the only monastery ever to have a dungeon stuffed with 16,000 zombies.	[reply]
Re^5: [OT] How about an Off Topic Section? by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Jun 07, 2015 at 14:58 UTC
Re^6: [OT] How about an Off Topic Section? by jdporter (Paladin) on Jun 07, 2015 at 15:24 UTC
Some notes below your chosen depth have not been shown here
Re^5: [JavaScript] by LanX (Saint) on Jun 07, 2015 at 20:13 UTC
Re^6: [OT] How about an Off Topic Section? by jdporter (Paladin) on Jun 07, 2015 at 21:30 UTC
Some notes below your chosen depth have not been shown here