in reply to Re^11: [OT] How about a 'Related Topics' (Off Topic) Section?
in thread [OT] How about an Off Topic Section?

'I've no such agenda.'

Actually, you've got '21000 posts that prove you wrong!'
  • Comment on Re^12: [OT] How about a 'Related Topics' (Off Topic) Section?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^13: [OT] How about a 'Related Topics' (Off Topic) Section?
by chacham (Prior) on Jun 22, 2015 at 12:20 UTC

    Insulting as this comment (and all the others in the sub-thread) is, on its own, it is an excellent riposte. :)

    Regardless, this entire sub-thread ought to be aborted. There's nothing but insults here.

Re^13: [OT] How about a 'Related Topics' (Off Topic) Section?
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Jun 08, 2015 at 23:16 UTC

    There's no arguing against "logic" like that. So I won't bother trying.

      Kind of like you have not bothered to add the section yourself?

        Kind of like you have not bothered to add the section yourself?

        Clearly you have no idea how perlmonks works, only gods can make actual changes like add sections ... everybody else can propose changes