in reply to Re^7: [OT] How about a 'Related Topics' (Off Topic) Section?
in thread [OT] How about an Off Topic Section?

...I'm sure it's non-trivial...

Yes it is trival, it has been trivial at least since 2004, a long time ago

  • Comment on Re^8: [OT] How about a 'Related Topics' (Off Topic) Section?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^9: [OT] How about a 'Related Topics' (Off Topic) Section?
by Anonymous Monk on Jun 08, 2015 at 23:02 UTC
    ... which is a sign that it is un-necessary ...

      ... which is a sign that it is un-necessary ...

      Yes, its a clear sign, all those admonishments to mind the rules and stay on topic, and add "OT" to title, yes, that is a clear sign that an off topic section isn't warranted -- brilliant logic jeffart

        "that is a clear sign that an off topic section isn't warranted ..."

        Then perhaps 10 years of repeatedly being knocked down will change your mind, Mr. "I have to change the world around me because I am too weak to change myself."