in reply to Re^10: [OT] How about a 'Related Topics' (Off Topic) Section?
in thread [OT] How about an Off Topic Section?

How's that? (Or was that the first non-sequitous thing that popped into your poor overloaded head.)

With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". I'm with torvalds on this
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice. Agile (and TDD) debunked
  • Comment on Re^11: [OT] How about a 'Related Topics' (Off Topic) Section?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^12: [OT] How about a 'Related Topics' (Off Topic) Section?
by Anonymous Monk on Jun 09, 2015 at 00:18 UTC
    Your ego tried to soar but your dinosaur legs kept you on the ground.
[reply]

      Dickhead!

[reply]
        I think you mean Richardhead ... Nixon masks are great!
[reply]
        And now you know what you look like in the mirror. Go back and read your words in this thread. You are a bitter, mean, and inhuman person.
[reply]

In Section Perl Monks Discussion