Re: Perl 6 section?

Echoing that same sentiment, I find that PM seems to work just fine, and to handle all sorts of topics including but not limited to P6, within a very simple, almost austere, number of categories. If you simply say “Perl-6” somewhere in the topic, Super Search will find it. Any Perl-related topic is fair game. You don’t have to pick a particular box to put your topic in. In effect, you “tag it,” just by what you put into the title or the message body. And the whole thing seems (to me) to work remarkably well by its simplicity.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Perl 6 section? by chacham (Prior) on Jun 10, 2015 at 13:09 UTC
Would Perl 6 questions benefit best by prefixing Perl 6: in the title, in the message, or in the code?	[reply]
Re^3: Perl 6 section? by GotToBTru (Prior) on Jun 10, 2015 at 18:49 UTC
Title at minimum, I think. That way it is obvious to those perusing Recent Threads, as well as being searchable. Dum Spiro Spero	[reply]
Re^4: Perl 6 section? by chacham (Prior) on Jun 11, 2015 at 12:04 UTC
This is completely different the StackOverflow's credo of no tags in the title. PM is a breath of fresh air. :)	[reply]
Re^3: Perl 6 section? by jdporter (Paladin) on Jun 10, 2015 at 20:16 UTC
Restricting oneself to only one of those three is a false economy. I reckon we are the only monastery ever to have a dungeon stuffed with 16,000 zombies.	[reply]