in reply to Re: Need more precision.
in thread Need more precision.

It looks like there are a few libraries, at least one, QPFloat, with a windows version.

Sorry. Did you see one that specifically stated that MSVC was supported? (I'm looking again, but not seeing it?)

With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". I'm with torvalds on this
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice. Agile (and TDD) debunked

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Need more precision.
by Anonymous Monk on Jun 09, 2015 at 23:32 UTC
[reply]

      I thought about trying to use the 80-bit precision that available in the x87 FPU, but to get access to it I'd have to drop into assembler; and with MSVCx64, that means using MASM64 as the 64-bit compiler doesn't support inline asm.

      But Masm64 (the version I have) is borked. It doesn't support a crap load of stuff you want it to; it's macro facilities have a habit of producing unassemblable code; and there is no support available at all. There are only about 10 pages of information about writing Masm64 code on the entire 'net; and half of those are just stolen copies of the other half.

      Pretty much a dead end.

      With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
      Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
      "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". I'm with torvalds on this
      In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice. Agile (and TDD) debunked
[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom