Re^4: [OT] How about an Off Topic Section?

But what are you trying to promote? Your politics? Because that is what will happen. A bunch of monks advocating and arguing about political causes.

We do not need an OT section because we need more posts about Perl. Not less.

Comment on Re^4: [OT] How about an Off Topic Section?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: [OT] How about an Off Topic Section? by salva (Canon) on Jun 10, 2015 at 12:36 UTC
Well, I have the opinion that when you get together a group of people with some common interest they would probably have interesting (for them) conversations about things both related and unrelated to that common interest.	[reply]
Re^6: [OT] How about an Off Topic Section? by Anonymous Monk on Jun 10, 2015 at 19:18 UTC
An OT section is not necessary for that, because Perlmonks has been allowing people of a common interest (Perl) to have related and unrelated conversations longer than you have been a member.	[reply]
Re^5: [OT] How about an Off Topic Section? by Anonymous Monk on Jun 10, 2015 at 22:12 UTC
Also tangentially relevant: Why does PerlMonks work? and the linked article in particular.	[reply]