Re^2: Can It Be Written In Base X With Only 1s And 0s

In order to find the next element I consulted The on-line encyclopedia of integer sequences. Funnily enough they only have the sequence up to 82000. There is a reference to this paper where the author claims that the next number would be at least 10**21 according to his experiments.

Comment on Re^2: Can It Be Written In Base X With Only 1s And 0s

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Can It Be Written In Base X With Only 1s And 0s by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Jun 16, 2015 at 07:19 UTC
I can atest to it being greater than 95367431640625. Even assuming that my "sum of single powers" hypothesis is correct; I think it will take more cpu power than I'm prepared to expend to look much beyond that. With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday' Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error. "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". I'm with torvalds on this In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice. Agile (and TDD) debunked	[reply]
Re^3: Can It Be Written In Base X With Only 1s And 0s by ikegami (Patriarch) on Jun 16, 2015 at 12:46 UTC
Actually, it says at least 10²¹⁸⁴, as I previously mentioned.	[reply]