in reply to Re^7: Can It Be Written In Base X With Only 1s And 0s
in thread Can It Be Written In Base X With Only 1s And 0s
I didn't change anything. (Please ask tye to verify that I made no edits at all!)
I didn't say you edited your node.
Re^3: Can It Be Written In Base X With Only 1s And 0s: "All of them can be defined as the sums of multiples of powers of 3."
Re^5: Can It Be Written In Base X With Only 1s And 0s: "These are all sums of multiple powers of three less than 3^11"
So despite "not understanding" the subject, you fixed what the mistake I pointed out.
The only post in the entire thread that contains the phrase "sums of multiple powers of three"; is yours.
You said it twice in Re^5: Can It Be Written In Base X With Only 1s And 0s (once verbatim, and once with "3" instead of "three").
And I didn't mention 6 anywhere.
That's the point. It's not one of the numbers you listed, but it a sum of multiples of powers of 3, so either 6 should be on your list or the list isn't the list of "sums of multiples of powers of 3".
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^9: Can It Be Written In Base X With Only 1s And 0s
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Jun 16, 2015 at 18:17 UTC | |
by ikegami (Patriarch) on Jun 16, 2015 at 18:25 UTC | |
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Jun 16, 2015 at 18:28 UTC | |
by ikegami (Patriarch) on Jun 16, 2015 at 18:31 UTC | |
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Jun 16, 2015 at 18:35 UTC | |
| |
|
Re^9: Can It Be Written In Base X With Only 1s And 0s
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Jun 16, 2015 at 18:26 UTC | |
by ikegami (Patriarch) on Jun 16, 2015 at 18:28 UTC |