Re^18: Using STDIN after exec() with ActiveState Perl

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^19: Using STDIN after exec() with ActiveState Perl by Anonymous Monk on Jun 23, 2015 at 09:21 UTC
Thanks for looking into this. The problem is that my script must be able to modify the environment variables as many times as needed during its execution, which would lead to a growing number of idle perl processes with this solution. I would argue you must be missing an API call that exists and does the same thing directly, no relying on %ENV	[reply]
Re^20: Using STDIN after exec() with ActiveState Perl by Yaribz (Beadle) on Jun 23, 2015 at 09:35 UTC
~~You're totally right, cf Re^20: Using STDIN after exec() with ActiveState Perl~~ edit: oh actually I guess you meant an API call in the dynamic library I load, which would allow me to avoid relying on environment variables. Yes you're right, unfortunately there is no such API function to set the write directory (only data directories). And if it was added now, I wouldn't be able to use it anyway since I have to maintain backward compatibility with older versions of this library.	[reply]
Re^19: Using STDIN after exec() with ActiveState Perl by RonW (Parson) on Jun 23, 2015 at 17:37 UTC
Are there several processes running in parallel that use different version of the library? If they are not parallel, instead of exiting after `system` returns, loop back up and determine the next set of ENV variable settings for the next run via `system`. If several parallel sequential runs, just run as many "top level" instances of the top level Perl program as needed.	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^20: Using STDIN after exec() with ActiveState Perl by Yaribz (Beadle) on Jun 23, 2015 at 20:04 UTC
Several instances are usually running in parallel and might be using different versions of the library, yes. The next set of ENV variables would be known by the child process but not the idle "top level" one, so I would have to pass back the info to the parent process. It would be a possible workaround indeed, but I prefer the "simplicity" of the workaround I'm using right now which simply avoids exec/system when running on Windows (cf Re^20: Using STDIN after exec() with ActiveState Perl). But thanks again nonetheless.	[reply]