in reply to Re: Additions to Approved HTML
in thread Additions to Approved HTML

Thanks, ikegami. I had removed the original suggestion for changes to the '<code>' element from the proposal (see Re^2: Additions to Approved HTML). I should've also updated the OP - now done.

-- Ken

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Additions to Approved HTML
by ikegami (Patriarch) on Jun 30, 2015 at 19:28 UTC

    It's still in the OP.

    It would, of course, be important, that <code uni> still renders character entity references as written; e.g. &gt; still renders as &gt; and not >.

    It's impossible to have auto-escaping and be able to display Ā.

    Update: Oh I see what mean. You "removed" it by adding an update that says it's been removed.