in reply to Re^2: Win32::API in perl v5.20.2
in thread Win32::API in perl v5.20.2

Hi Bill,

Strawberry also offers a portable version, where everything is contained within a specific directory tree and nothing is changed to your system.

In other words, you can install it and test it without having to decide immediately whether you really want to switch.

Personally, when working on Windows (i.e. only at home, where I really need a Windows box because I am using some proprietary software applications that only exist on Windows and Mac, but not on Linux)), I prefer using Cygwin (because I prefer a Unix-like environment with a real shell and Unix commands), but I have both ActiveState and Strawberry installed on my PC, Strawberry is really better in terms of module management, IMHO.

Anyway, the bottom line is that, with portable Strawberry, you can test it without having to decide to change immediately.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Win32::API in perl v5.20.2
by Anonymous Monk on Jul 03, 2015 at 21:39 UTC

    Strawberry is really better in terms of module management, IMHO.

    The only difference between the two is brand name and licensing terms and what comes downloaded/preloaded

      Are you just kidding or are you trolling?

      You probably have not used both recently.

      OK, I've just made a rare exception to my personal policy of usually not responding to this type of Anonymous Monk comments, I will not comment further.

        Are you just kidding or are you trolling?

        Neither; why do you think I'm not serious?

        You probably have not used both recently.

        Is 2015-06-26 recent enough? Nothing has really changed since there was a strawberryperl

        OK, I've just made a rare exception to my personal policy of usually not responding to this type of Anonymous Monk comments, I will not comment further.

        Do you read the comments? Remember Re: Advantages of Activeperl vs Strawberry Perl? strawberryperl/activesperl/citrusperl they're all just perl